Teacher practice: a spotlight on the use of feedback and conferencing in the first year of schooling

With the prevalence of statements that refer to a need to “bridge”, “narrow” or “close” gaps in achievement it would appear that Government bodies have an appreciation for the fact that students need not be victims of circumstance. In addition to this, research has suggested that certain skills, such as the acquisition of phonemic awareness, need to be acquired in the early years to ensure that children do not fall behind their peers. Use of feedback is one way in which teachers have attempted to positively influence student outcomes. There are authors, however, who have suggested that not all forms of feedback are necessarily effective. In light of these perspectives, this study sought to investigate whether the incorporation of student/teacher conferences into a pre-existing program could be seen to support the development of phonemic awareness skills of students in their first year of schooling

Literature in the Australian English Curriculum: Victorian Primary School Teachers’ Practices, Challenges and Preparedness to Teach

The introduction of the Literature strand within the Australian Curriculum requires all teachers to engage students in print and digital literature that embrace the cross-curriculum priorities and support students to examine, evaluate, and discuss literary texts. However, such curriculum change assumes that primary school teachers who have often not studied literature as a specific method, have the confidence and content and pedagogical knowledge to plan and implement programs. This paper investigates teachers’ views of their level of confidence and preparedness to teach literature, and to explore teachers’ practices, challenges and enablers in teaching literature in both print and digital environments. Results show that this group of 321 primary school teachers reported varying levels of confidence, knowledge and practices, and offers new insights into complex challenges they’ve experienced when interpreting and enacting the literature curriculum. Findings suggest the critical need for professional learning and discuss the implications for initial-teacher education programs

Becoming a 21st century literacy teacher:provocations, perceptions and possibilities in teacher education

This paper reports on a study that investigated pre-service teachers’ digital funds of knowledge and their perceptions of the digital pedagogies and practices in early years literacy classrooms. It also explores pre-service teachers’ experiences of “produsing” a cumulative multimodal portfolio (in the form of a wiki) and its application for future literacy teaching and learning. Specifically, 123 education students enrolled in their second year of an undergraduate initial-teacher education course at an Australian university completed an anonymous survey. The resultsshow that this group of students were active users of technology-based tools, but had limited experience with using participatory user-led knowledge creation tools (such as Web 2.0 technologies) although many observed the use of these tools in early years literacy classrooms while on professional experience school placements. Further findings show thatalthough the majority of this group of pre-service teachers felt more confident after creating a wiki and reported that they would use them in future literacy teaching and learning, their understandings of the pedagogical and creative potential of these digital tools in supporting literacy learning in young children appeared limited. The findings suggest that there is a need for educators in higher education to understand their students’ digital funds of knowledge and to provide rich opportunities to support these students’ use and understandings of the affordances of these new technologies as vehicles to explore and enrich 21st century literacy learning in early years digital environments

Teachers’ aides working in secondary school settings: preparedness and professional learning

In Victoria, Australia teachers’ aides (TAs) are employed to provide support to students with disabilities in accessing their education. The role of the TAs varies within and across school settings. Drawing from the findings of a quantitative study, the purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of teachers’ aides’ perceptions of their preparedness to perform 18 student-related tasks within the state secondary school setting in Victoria, Australia. In all, 163 participants completed the on-line questionnaire. The results of the study showed that that in general TAs perceive there are tasks relevant to their roles in supporting students with disabilities; and there are tasks that are not applicable to that role. The TAs in this study considered that they had training that enabled them to effectively perform the listed student related tasks to support students with disabilities in the secondary school environment

Principal led school improvement and teacher capacity building in the Barwon South Network : final report, May 2013

The period of interest for this report is the beginning of 2011 to the end of 2012. The period commenced when the Regional Network Leader of the Barwon South Network of schools in the Barwon South Region of the Department of Education and Early Childhood contacted the School of Education at Deakin University, Waurn Ponds Campus Geelong. The Regional Network Leader outlined a desire to engage with Deakin University to research a short-term-cycle model of school improvement to be implemented in the region. While the model was expected to be taken on by all schools in the region the research was limited to the 23 schools in the Barwon South Network with four schools to be investigated more closely for each of two years (2001 & 2012) – eight focus schools in total. Many positive outcomes flowed from the implementation of short-term-cycle school improvement plans and their associated practices but there was wide variation in the nature and degrees of success and of the perception of the process. The research team asked the following questions of the data:1. What aspects of the School Improvement Plan (SIP) approach were important for initiating and supporting worthwhile change?2. What might we take from this, to provide guidance on how best to support change in teaching and learning processes in schools?The School Improvement Plan (SIP) worked in a range of ways. At one level it was strongly focused on school leadership, and a need to improve principals’ capacity to initiate worthwhile teaching and learning processes in their schools. Underlying this intent, one might think an assumption is operation is that the leadership process involves top down decision-making and a willingness to hold staff accountable for the quality of their practice. The second strong focus was on the translation into practice and the consequent effect on student learning, involving an emphasis on data and evidence led practice. Hence, along with the leadership focus there was a demand for the process of school improvement to reach down into students and classrooms. Thus, the SIP process inevitably involved a chain of decision-making by which student learning quality drove the intervention, and teachers responsible for this had a common view. The model therefore should not be seen as an intervention only on the principal, but rather on the school decision-making system and focus. Even though it was the principal receiving the SIP planning template, and reporting to the network, the reporting was required to include description of the operation of the school processes, of classroom processes, and of student learning. This of course placed significant constraints on principals, which may help explain the variation in responses and outcomes described above.The findings from this study are based on multiple data sources: analysis of both open and closed survey questions which all teachers in the 23 schools in the network were invited to complete; interviews with principals, teachers and leaders in the eight case study schools; some interviews with students in the case study schools; and interviews with leaders who worked in the regional network office; and field notes from network meetings including the celebrations days. Celebrations days occurred each school term when groups of principals came together to share and celebrate the improvements and processes happening in their schools. Many of the themes emerging from the analysis of the different data sources were similar or overlapping, providing some confidence in the evidence-base for the findings. The study, conducted over two years of data collection and analysis, has demonstrated a range of positive outcomes in at the case study schools relating to school communication and collaboration processes, professional learning of principals, leadership teams and classroom teachers. There was evidence in the survey responses and field notes from ‘celebration days’ that these outcomes were also represented in other schools in the network. The key points of change concerned the leadership processes of planning for improvement, and the rigorous attention to student data in framing teaching and learning processes. This latter point of change had the effect of basing SIP processes on a platform of evidence-based change. The research uncovered considerable anecdotal and observational evidence of improvements in student learning, in teacher accounts in interview, and presentations of student work. Interviews with students, although not as representative as the team would have liked, showed evidence of student awareness of learning goals, a key driver in the SIP improvement model. It was, however, not possible over this timescale to collect objective comparative evidence of enhanced learning outcomes. A number of features of the short-term-cycle SIP were identified that supported positive change across the network. These were: 1) the support structures represented by the network leader and support personnel within schools, 2) the nature of the SIP model – focusing strongly on change leadership but within a collaborative structure that combined top-down and bottom-up elements, 3) the focus on data-led planning and implementation that helped drill down to explicit elements of classroom practice, and 4) the accountability regimes represented by network leader presence, and the celebration days in which principals became effectively accountable to their peers. We found that in the second year of the project, momentum was lost in the case study schools, as the network was dismantled. This raised issues also for the conduct of research in situations of systemic change. Alongside the finding of evidence of positive outcomes in the case study schools overall, was the finding that the SIP processes and outcomes varied considerably across schools. A number of contextual factors were identified that led to this variation, including school histories of reform, principal management style, and school size and structure that made the short-term-cycle model unmanageable. In some cases there was overt resistance to the SIP model, at least in some part, and this led to an element of performativity in which the language of the SIP was conscripted to other purposes. The study found that even with functioning schools the SIP was understood differently and the processes performed differently, raising the question of whether in the study we are dealing with one SIP or many. The final take home message from the research is that schools are complex institutions, and models of school improvement need to involve both strong principled features, and flexibility in local application, if all schools’ interests in improving teaching and learning processes and outcomes are to be served

Examining the paradoxes children experience in language and literacy learning

Paradoxes are particularly problematic in literacy as they often complicate learning. However, identifying and examining them can also tell us something about the inherent problems within social, political, and educational systems. This paper reports on an analysis of a total of 205 AJLL articles and editorials, published between 2011 and 2021. The purpose of the study was to identify the paradoxes associated with student language and literacy learning. The systematic literature review identified 311 instances of paradoxes across these 205 articles. Thirty instances of paradoxical terminology associated with student literacy learning were selected from the 311 instances. The excluded 271 instances of paradox were associated with policy contexts, teacher performance, and accountabilities, which are outside the scope of this article. The research in the 205 articles found that literacy learning was shaped by the skills of literacy learning, the complexity of student learning through standardised approaches, and textual plurality. The contexts of literacy learning spanned the virtual and real, the implications of national testing on local situations, and the changing nature of text and what it means to be literate. This review identified that students negotiate paradoxes associated with the risks of standardised testing, the narrowing of the writing curriculum, and understanding the variety of textual forms and practices. Identifying and examining these paradoxes will help address some of the persistent problems in literacy learning faced by students and teachers

It’s more than words: Supporting young children’s language development

The early years of a child’s life are recognised as a critical time for language development. Strong language skills are acquired within rich social environments and are linked to children’s pretend play abilities, literacy development, social skills, theory of mind, and are essential for educational success throughout life. However, research has shown that many young children are entering school with low levels of oral language, which suggests that these children will also experience difficulties with reading comprehension, interacting with peers and making friends, taking turns in conversations, and taking the perspective of others. The role of early years teachers and educators in supporting young children’s oral language abilities is of paramount importance, and even more so since Covid-19 lockdowns where opportunities for children to use language in social contexts were reduced. The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia v2.0 recognises the significance of fostering children’s language, particularly across the five Learning Outcomes and more explicitly in Learning Outcome 5: Children are Effective Communicators. However, it is assumed that early childhood educators and teachers have a strong understanding of language and the link to other learning areas, as well as the ways to assess children’s language use, and the practices that foster all aspects of children’s language. This presentation will outline the components of language and highlight the relationship between the social use of language (pragmatics) and other areas of development. Findings from 3 recent research studies that investigated children’s language and play abilities at school entry; teachers’ talk in supporting children’s language; and the Supporting Oral Language Development (SOLD) professional learning program will also be presented

Spoken language and speech perception abilities in deaf children

Despite early diagnosis, early fitting of more advanced sensory aids, early intervention, and intensive educational management, many children with severe to profound hearing loss are delayed in their acquisition of spoken language compared with their peers with normal hearing. More...Some of the greatest challenges facing educators of deaf children include determining where to focus intervention in order to maximise benefit, and establishing the most effective strategies for the development of age-appropriate language. The experimental research in this book examined the relationship between hearing, speech production, and vocabulary knowledge, and investigated the contributions of these factors to the overall speech perception performance of deaf children. This research also investigated the areas in which intervention would be most beneficial, and examined the effects of different types of intervention on the development of spoken language and speech perception skills in deaf children. The evaluation, analysis and intervention methods reported in this book provide an experimentally validated program for improving speech perception, speech production and spoken language skills of deaf children

Speech production skills, vocabulary development, and speech perception abilities in children with hearing loss: intervention and outcomes

© 2007 Dr. Louise Ellen PaatschDespite early diagnosis, early fitting of more advanced sensory aids, early intervention, and intensive educational management, many children with severe to profound hearing loss are delayed in their acquisition of spoken language compared with their peers with normal hearing. Some of the greatest challenges facing educators of children with hearing loss include determining where to focus intervention in order to maximise benefit, and establishing the most effective strategies for the development of age-appropriate language. The experimental research in this thesis, conducted across three studies, examined the relationship between hearing, speech production, and vocabulary knowledge, and investigated the contributions of these factors to the overall speech perception performance of children with hearing loss. This research also investigated the areas in which intervention would be most beneficial, and examined the effects of different types of intervention on the development of spoken language and speech perception skills in children with hearing loss. The first study collected and analysed data to validate a simple non-linear mathematical model that describes the effects of hearing, vocabulary knowledge, and speech production on the perception test scores for monosyllabic words by children with hearing loss. Thirty-three primary-school children with hearing loss, fitted with hearing aids and/or cochlear implants, were evaluated, using speech perception, reading-aloud, speech production, and language measures. Results from these measures were analysed using the mathematical model. It was found that performance on an open-set speech perception word test in the auditory-alone mode is strongly dependent on residual hearing levels, lexical knowledge, and speech production abilities. Further applications of the model provided an estimate of the effect of each component on the overall speech perception score for each child. The separation of these components made it possible to ascertain which children would benefit most from specific language intervention, and which children would benefit from more advanced sensory aids. However, further investigation of the effectiveness of different intervention strategies on the development of speech perception skills is required. In the second study, 12 primary school-aged children with hearing loss participated in two types of speech production intervention to determine which was the most effective in improving speech production skills. After an 8-week intensive program, speech production skills improved for all children, with greater improvements evident in the articulation of phonemes trained at a phonological level. Untrained vowels and consonants also improved after intervention. These findings suggest that intensive speech production intervention in the context of words, sentences, and discourse is effective not only in improving the production of those phonemes trained, but may also result in the generalisation of taught speech skills into other aspects of children's spoken language. The final study applied the mathematical model postulated in the first study to the speech perception scores of 21 primary school-aged children with hearing loss. The children participated in intensive speech production and vocabulary intervention programs. The speech production intervention program implemented the strategies that were found to be effective in the second study, while the vocabulary intervention involved learning the meanings of words. The speech production intervention produced a small but significant improvement in the production of consonants in words, while the vocabulary intervention improved knowledge of word meanings substantially. Both types of intervention significantly improved speech perception performance. These findings demonstrate that the relationships between speech perception, speech production, and vocabulary knowledge are causal rather than merely associative. The application of the model also assisted in identifying the most effective methods of improving receptive and expressive spoken language skills for individual children with hearing loss. In summary, the results from this research provided further evidence of the complex relationship between hearing, speech perception, vocabulary knowledge, and speech production. This research highlights the factors requiring consideration in the interpretation of speech perception scores. Separation of the contributions of hearing, lexical knowledge, and speech production to speech perception scores enabled a better understanding of factors contributing to children's performance levels, and facilitated the development of more appropriate intervention. Speech production and vocabulary intervention were shown to be valuable and beneficial in the individual education programs of many children with hearing loss who exhibit delays in spoken language skills. The evaluation, analysis, and intervention methods reported in this thesis provide an experimentally validated program for improving speech perception, speech production, and spoken language skills of school-aged children with hearing loss